Tag Archives: Hoccleve at Home

Hoccleve at Home: Yea Jung Park, Jan. 26

Please join us on Monday, January 26, 2026 at 2pm Eastern time (7pm GMT) for the next “Hoccleve at Home” talk. Our speaker will be Yea Jung Park (Saint Louis University), who will give a talk titled, “Overhearing and Life-reading in Hoccleve’s Series.” Here is a summary of Yea Jung’s talk:

Most readers of Hoccleve’s Complaint recognize that the narrator eavesdrops and overhears when catching snatches of gossip about himself in the “prees” of London, but tend to leave it at that. This talk asks if we can make more of this oblique mode of delivery in understanding Hoccleve’s poetic choices elsewhere, especially as he attempts to craft a new vision of his future life trajectory through the Series. Hoccleve builds a dynamic of secret listening and secret (self-)witnessing in the Complaint that he draws on later in the Dialogue, pointing to them as powerfully productive (if tortured) modes of knowledge-making. This talk will test out (and ask you for your opinion on!) whether such knowledges in fact help or hinder the case Hoccleve puts forth—that only he himself can know his own body, mind, and future prospects best.

Please email hocclevesociety@gmail.com for the video link.

Leave a comment

Filed under Hoccleve at Home

Upcoming Hoccleve at Home event: Prof. Joyce Coleman, Feb. 12

Mark your calendars for the first Hoccleve at Home event of 2024:

Joyce Coleman (Oklahoma University)

“Hoccleve vs. Mowbray: Whose Book Is It?”

Monday, Feb 12, 2024

1pm Central (2pm Eastern, 7pm GMT) on Zoom

If you’re not on our mailing list, contact hocclevesociety@gmail.com for the link

Writing in 1994, Derek Pearsall suggested that, c. 1411-13, the future Henry V had commissioned Thomas Hoccleve to write The Regiment of Princes, and then to oversee the creation of copies to distribute among important courtiers, in “a concerted attempt … to cement relationships with possibly doubtful friends.”

Ten years earlier, however, Kate Harris had proposed that the arms in the initials under the famous presentation image and on ff. 1 and 71 of London, BL Arundel 38 were all linked to John Mowbray, the future duke of Norfolk—not to the prince and to Thomas FitzAlan, earl of Arundel, as had long been accepted. This discovery convinced some scholars that Mowbray had commissioned at least the Arundel manuscript, and that the kneeling presenter was Mowbray, not the author, Hoccleve. Alternatively, other scholars (and various online sites) claim that the image shows Henry presenting the book to the kneeling Mowbray. These theories have tended to overshadow Pearsall’s argument.  

Prof. Coleman’s talk will re-examine this controversy, supporting Pearsall’s suggestions, and the kneeler’s authorial identity, via analysis of the layout of the presentation image and of the controversial pink gown.

Leave a comment

Filed under Hoccleve at Home